If you asked me what my favorite type of fruit was, I could tell you in two ways. Way #1: “Well, I like fruits with seeds. Sometimes they’re sweet; sometimes they’re sour. They have green leaves on the top. They’re pretty small, too.” You might respond, “you mean a strawberry?” Then I’d say yes, and you’d know my answer. Or, I could tell you another way: Way #2: “It’s a strawberry.” This is the simple way to explain top-down communication. From the listener’s perspective, it is much easier to know what someone is talking about without having to follow a bunch of small, tiny details. But from the speaker’s perspective, it can feel uncomfortable, especially in work situations. In work situations, we often identify as a "thinker," or "analyst," and spend most of our time in the thought process or analysis before generating the answer. When it comes time to share our findings, it only feels natural to prioritize the details. Details matter, of course, but people often don’t want to stick around for them unless you’ve laid out a compelling high-level vision for what the reader can expect. Almost all great stories begin with a high-level “hook” that creates suspense, gives context, or creates tension. Consider one of the best books of all time, Tale of Two Cities: “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.” While there’s not much detail in this passage it invites you to go deeper into a story of oppositions (and one that is going to be well written too). In business communication, the high-level context is the “so what?” – This is the information that tells the audience of your message and why they should pay attention. So don’t say, “Here is the financial information.” Say, “Given the recent challenges on our major product lines, this analysis will show the two major pressures that have put pressure on profitability.” When I give feedback to people on writing and presentations, I often just ask them, “What are you trying to say.” Whatever they tell me I then respond with, “Just say that!” The tendency to want to share every last detail with your audience is something I like to call book report thinking, the tendency to treat work like a school book report where we are supposed to prove that we actually read the book. In real life, people don’t really care about how much work you’ve done or how you did it at all. They want useful information to enable them to help you or do their own job better. So remember: Start from the top. Tell people why it matters. If I had to give myself a bit of feedback on this newsletter issue, I probably should have started with: “This is a short reflection on how to communicate more clearly by starting with the most important things first,” Guess I still have some learning to do. Go DeeperWatch the full video here explaining top-down communication: |
Freelancer, creator & writer
I started StrategyU to teach knowledge workers the tools, frameworks, mindsets, and approaches that I learned in strategy consulting. When I started this, I thought that my audience would be people in big companies stuck inside strategy, finance, or analytics groups that didn’t have access to training. This was one of the segments that have found value in my work but a second segment that surprised me has been small and medium-sized consulting firms ranging from 5 people to 200. Over the last...
"Strategy" is a word that attracts a lot of excitement in the business world. People who work on strategy get paid more and senior executives like to use the word a lot to talk about their decisions. In consulting, I worked with many companies helping them to develop strategies. Although these were often focused on different levels of the business and different topics, all of the "strategies" were similar. They each included: A synthesis of all of the relevant information about a company...
Consulting, at its core, is a series of steps: defining the problem, gathering data, analyzing, synthesizing, and making recommendations. Countless frameworks such as DMAIC, the scientific method, and the McKinsey 7-step problem-solving process, exist to guide you through those steps. But what separates truly high-performing consulting firms from the rest? It’s not just the process; it’s the “meta-process”: the ongoing reflection on, and improvement of, how the process is carried out. Elite...